Supreme Court Sides with Landowner in Rails-to-Trails Case

Supreme Court Sides with Landowner in Rails-to-Trails Case


Published On: May 15, 20140.7 min read
Table of contents
Share Post

Throughout the 19th century, Congress spurred track expansion by granting land and other property rights to private railroad operators. These days, however, more tracks are getting torn up than put down. In many instances, this causes certain property rights to revert back to original owners. At least that’s how it’s supposed to happen, according to a landmark Supreme Court decision in March that focused on rails-to-trails projects. One justice wrote that Congress “granted an easement and nothing more” — meaning that without an operating rail system there are no lingering right-of-ways for recreational trails. Although the ruling centered on a case in Wyoming’s Medicine Bow National Forest, its impact will be felt in dozens of states with ongoing cases where owners are challenging rails-to-trails projects. Read more HERE.

Stay in the loop

Subscribe to our free newsletter